Ferrari's real rival in Mexico wore red too, and Vasseur must act
Ferrari had pole and the pace to win in Mexico City, then lost to Verstappen by 0.799 seconds. The problem was lap one and a garage with no clear rules.
AI-generated image
How many wins can a team throw away before it admits the opponent is sitting on the other side of the garage? Ferrari arrived at the Mexico City Grand Prix with a pole position, the quicker car on race day by Lewis Hamilton's own account, and left with a second place that tasted like vinegar.
Here is what happened. Hamilton started from pole, and Charles Leclerc, starting third, passed him on the opening lap. There was contact, and Leclerc later got a five-second penalty for gaining an advantage by running long. According to the Adnkronos report, the pit wall told Leclerc to stay in front, with the place to be handed back, but Max Verstappen was by then between the two. Verstappen won, and Hamilton finished second, 0.799 seconds behind. Leclerc finished fourth after serving his penalty.
The pit wall's order was the wrong kind of clarity
Look at that radio instruction again: stay ahead, the position will be returned. In theory it is a reasonable rule. In practice it tells one driver to keep the place he took by force, while the other watches a rival slip through the gap. It is an order that arrives after the damage and solves nothing.
Hamilton says the drivers' briefing was clear: whoever runs wide at the first corner gives the place back. He also pointed out that he took a 10-second penalty last year for a similar move. We can't verify the briefing from here, and Leclerc has conceded, as Formula1.com reports, that he deserved the penalty. But if Hamilton's account is right, the team had a rule, a driver broke it, and the team's response on track was ambiguous. That is a management failure, not a racing incident.
Vasseur is right about respect, and wrong if he stops at the scolding
Fred Vasseur did not hold back. Per Racer, he accused both drivers of a lack of respect for Ferrari's staff and brand, and other outlets quote him saying the lost win was "difficult to digest" and reminding them that their actions affect around 2,000 employees. We think the sentiment is fair. A team that spends a season building its first pole of 2026 should not see it evaporate in a few hundred meters.
But a public telling-off is the cheap part of man-management. The expensive part is writing the rules down before the lights go out: who yields, in which corner, and who is allowed to decide mid-race. Without that, the next lap-one clash is a matter of when, not if.
The Race's verdict points in the same direction. Its snippet says Ferrari seems to have missed the "giant red flag of Monza": let your drivers race hard on lap one, and it will cost you. We would add that Mexico City was not a surprise. It was a repeat.
Neither driver gets a free pass
It is tempting to make Leclerc the villain. He attacked on lap one, took the penalty and, by his own admission, deserved it. Italian press ratings were harsh on him, with Leggo scoring his day a 5 and calling him confused.
But Hamilton's own radio was no model of calm. He first said he had been pushed out by his teammate, then, on lap 25, claimed race control wanted Leclerc to win and that a victory had been stolen from him. The penalty itself contradicts that. Leclerc was sanctioned, and the stewards did what they should. Venting on the radio is human, but a driver publicly blaming officials for a loss that, by his own later account, began with an intra-team incident only muddies the story Ferrari needs to tell.
To his credit, Hamilton ended with a constructive call for what he termed "serious talks" inside the team, and he stressed that the car has grown considerably and that his hopes for next season depend on a power unit able to match rivals. That is the right reading. The chassis looks like a foundation to build on. The engine is the other job.
Our verdict
Ferrari does not have a speed problem in this episode. It has a governance problem. Vasseur should do three things before winter testing: publish internal rules for lap-one fights, state exactly who has the authority to order a position swap, and apply the same consequences to both drivers. Pretty speeches about respect won't win a race.
Meanwhile, Kimi Antonelli clinched the title in the same weekend for Mercedes, a reminder of what a settled team looks like. Ferrari can still fix this. But if the same red cars collide at the same corner next year, nobody will be able to blame bad luck.
No topics yet: start the first one.
More stories
BYD's 305,743 pure EVs say the plug-in hybrid party is cooling
BYD sold over 300,000 pure EVs in a month for the first time while plug-in hybrids fell 17.23%. It looks like a shift toward full EVs, and rivals should pay attention.
Heritage is no longer a moat: the EV shift shows which carmakers have a story
Brand-value rankings are punishing long-established automakers, but the real lesson isn't "go electric". In our view, it's that a badge without a clear promise is worth less than it was.
Antonelli's title proves Mercedes was right to bet on youth
The youngest champion in F1 history isn't a fairy tale: it's the payoff of a team that stuck with a young driver through a rough first year, and a warning for cautious rivals.
Honda's "catastrophic" warning shows who really pays for border tariffs
A 50% tariff on Canadian autos looks like a bargaining chip, but the US-Canada assembly line means the bill lands on American buyers first.



